![]() ![]() This method has been used to reproduce the free-choice experiments, Festinger/Carlsmith$1/$20, Brehm (0.50/$1.00) experiment. ![]() The person thus "stands in"for the actual subject. Rather than do the actual experiment, a subject is given a description orobserves the conditions of a dissoance experiment and then estimate theattitude of the oberserved subject. Interpersonal Simulations of Cognitive Dissonance studies Self-perceptiontheory would indicated that an observer of the behavior would conclude bythat action that they didn't like the non-chosen toy as much. Dissonance theory say the subject resolves thedissoance of rejecting the non-chosen item by devaluing it. ![]() #Amberlight experimental free#While cognitive dissonance can explain this behavior, it's simpler to noticethat if the subject just observed his own behavior he would arrive at thesame conclusion.Īfter free choice between two similarly rated items, subsequent ratingsare more different for the two items (higher for the chosen item, lowerfor the non-chosen item). Under severe threat they have "justification"for their not playing with the toy and so do not change their attitudes. "Self-perception theory states that if external contingencies seemsufficient to account for the behavior, then the individual will not beled into using the behavior as a source of evidence for his self-attributions""If any source implies irrelevance or low credibility, then self-attributionswill not occur."Ĭhildren to subsequently derogate a chosen toy when mildly threatened notto play with it (and they comply). This makessense from self-perception theory. People who agree to give speeches supportive of their initial attitude (whichshouldn't produce dissonance) does produce more attitude change. According to self-perceptiontheory, the observer sees his own behavior (telling lies to another subjectfor only $1) and concludes they must have liked the exercise more then theyoriginally thought. In these experiments the person is induced to engage in counter-attitudinalbehavior and their attitude is measured. Many of the pain perception experiments also support self-perception theory. In subsequent ratings of prevriouslyjudged neutral cartoons, the subject ranked those said as more funnier whenthe truth light was on. In one study subjects are told to speak the truth when an amber light ison and lie when a green light is on. Personal behavior is another clue to inner state (in the context of thesituation different attributions may be made).Ī person might infer his own beliefs from his behavior if there are no externalsituational reasons for the behavior (ex Festingers $1/$20 study). Valins heatbeat studiesshow the same thing. Schachter & Singer's studies of drug-induced arousal show people caninfer emotional sates from their environmental cues. In fact, we have no knowledge at all until we have been explicitly trained. When internal cues are weak, ambiguous, or uninterpretable,the individual is in the same position as the outside observer".Ĭhildren learn by "point and name" with even internal stimuli. "Indi viduals come to know their own attitudes, emotions and internalstates by inferring them from observations of their own behavior and circumstancesin which they occur. Advancesin Experimental Social Psychology, Vol 6, 1972. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |